i don't think there is a single country on earth who hasn't used race and religious differences as an excuse to destroy an enemy.
You are probably right, but some have used it more, and more recently than others. (Sweden though has only been at war with Norway, Denmark, Germany, Poland and maybe a few more countries laying close. I wouldn't say they could have used neither race nor religion as a reason for those wars.
i think the blacks that live in America would not like having worms digging in their eyes very much, just my opinion here though...
This is VERY offensive. First of all you assume that if whites wouldn't have taken blacks as slaves (and saving their descendants from eye worms) their descendants would live in terrible conditions. So you say it was a favor, what the white colonists did?
white society? we have our own society? why haven't i been informed...
also, why do you consider white people living in previously colonised areas ''damage''? Do you mean because they weren't there first? Going by that logic America needs to deport the asians and blacks before dealing with their white infestation. and then since the ''natives'' arrived over an ice bridge they need to be kicked out too.
When I say white society I mean the western world that somewhat share the same modern culture, a culture that is mainly copied from America though. Why I consider white people living in previously colonised areas "damage"? Apartheid ended 1994 in South Africa. The taint from it is still very clear.
I do not say America should be decolonized, in the current situation this would cause to much trouble, but how would that be different from how the Zionists taking back the country they lived in 2000 years ago? And yes, a decolonization would mean that the persons not given permanent residency by the established indigenous government would be deported.
other than all that, why not consider these damages to be caused by the COUNTRIES that colonised them and not the race that happens to be that country's majority?
But when you say this: "..that appear to mean whites are the bad guys and every other race is their victim", consider that the black slaves suffered due to white people, and so did the blacks that lived in areas colonized by whites. This suffering is to some degree inherited to their now living ancestors as the colonization back then has lead to worse conditions today, and the blacks living in America would not live there and would have lived under entirely different conditions (probably better if colonization never had occurred) than many do today. In the same way that the struggle is inherited for the blacks the guilt to some degree inherited by the whites, though first and foremost the constitutions that allowed the ruthless behavior of the colonists.
I do not mean that whites today can be held accountable for actions performed by our ancestors, but the damage done is still there and I think it is the duty of white society to counteract this damage so that it can be minimized.
Still, in the same way people of color today are affected by the oppression then in the role of the oppressed then white people today are affected by the oppression then in the role of the oppressor.
you mean America
Britain? The Netherlands? France? Germany? The list goes on.
So you are a self hating white man? Wow. I think you may be right for yourself at least, since all groups of people have racist people within them. Be it Latinos with La Raza hating the whites or the White Nazi's hating the Jews (and just about everyone else). But i think its unfair to say all white are racist or are any more racist than any other group of people.
I do not hate white people in any way. I am also not talking about a higher frequency of the extreme racists you talk about. I am talking about white privilege and how it is a form of racism.
On another note, white people also have the privilege of easier assimilating into other cultures, such as the hip hop culture that was a movement against violence and for creativity among blacks in the projects.