Sagan 4 Forum
May 20, 2013, 01:55:33 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Sagan 4 -- An alien planet ecosystem project -- Administrator -- Moderator -- Sagan 4 Team
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Top Heavy Ecosystems  (Read 1083 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hydromancerx
Administrator
Black-Winged Nobom
*****
Offline Offline

Awards:
Diorama MakerBiome AdopterLandmark MakerFood Web MakerDiversifierDiversifying MasterGeneration MasterCladogram MakerMoviemaker
Posts: 7676



View Profile
« on: May 15, 2008, 06:00:16 PM »

I have notices that many people have been making mostly big fauna again. While some is ok so many is not. We need many more little macro fauna (and microbes and flora). I got a California Autoboun book recently and  here is the break down of diversity...

  • 1 Large Carnivore (Cougar)
  • 6 Medium Carnivores (Bobcat, Coyote, Kit Fox, Gray Fox, Red Fox, Badger)
  • 7 Small Carnivores (Weasels and stuff)
  • 1 Large Omnivore (Black Bear)
  • 3 Medium Omnivores (Raccoon, Ringtail, Possum)
  • 6 Small Insectivores (Bats, Shews, Moles
  • 4 Large Herbivores (Deer, Bighorn Sheep, Elk, Prong Horn)
  • 6 Medium Herbivores (Rabbit, Beaver)
  • 27 Small Herbivores (Mice, Squirrels, Chipmunks)

As you can see there are much less large than there are small. We should have more. This was just mammals. I mean there were like 80 song birds, 10 birds of prey, 7 nectavores, then sea birds, waterfowl, tons of reptiles, amphibians, insects, etc.

It seems a bit lop sided when say we have like 5 big carnivores, 2 large herbivores, 1 small herbivore and and a hand full of detivores, nectavores etc.

In short I am thinking of putting a ban on creatures over 1 m for awhile that way we will be forced to make smaller creatures for the base of the ecosystem.
Logged

Maineiac
Sagan 4 Team
Carpotesta Luceremundare Serpentes
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 734


3 years and still going...


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2008, 06:05:22 PM »

this counts for plants and the atmosphere?
Logged




Neoskel
Sagan 4 Team
Beaked Deepworm
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 583


All we need is some icecream and a hug.


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2008, 06:12:33 PM »

You know, i think i might have that same book.

But, of course the list in the book isn't complete. And this is a post-urbanized environment we're talking about too. Humans drive out big predators and remove the habitat for big herbivores, leaving perfect conditions for a variety of small and medium sized adaptable animals while driving or killing off more specialized creatures.

Another thing is that the number of species of prey doesn't necessarily represent the availability of prey. Mice may be the only prey item of a certain size on farms in Australia, but oftentimes they're literally knee-deep in the critters. There may be hundreds of species of bugs living in the desert, but good luck finding many of them.

Hydro is still right about the fact that we need to concentrate more on small creatures though. I know that people connect more with larger animals, but we need smaller animals more right now.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2008, 06:15:23 PM by Neoskel » Logged


"Stop the world! I wanna get off."
Hydromancerx
Administrator
Black-Winged Nobom
*****
Offline Offline

Awards:
Diorama MakerBiome AdopterLandmark MakerFood Web MakerDiversifierDiversifying MasterGeneration MasterCladogram MakerMoviemaker
Posts: 7676



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2008, 11:34:06 PM »

this counts for plants and the atmosphere?

Flora can be bigger. See the general section for the rules on the 1 m thing.

1 m Limit - Please Read
http://sagan4.com/forum/index.php?topic=2441.0

You know, i think i might have that same book.

But, of course the list in the book isn't complete. And this is a post-urbanized environment we're talking about too. Humans drive out big predators and remove the habitat for big herbivores, leaving perfect conditions for a variety of small and medium sized adaptable animals while driving or killing off more specialized creatures.

Another thing is that the number of species of prey doesn't necessarily represent the availability of prey. Mice may be the only prey item of a certain size on farms in Australia, but oftentimes they're literally knee-deep in the critters. There may be hundreds of species of bugs living in the desert, but good luck finding many of them.

Hydro is still right about the fact that we need to concentrate more on small creatures though. I know that people connect more with larger animals, but we need smaller animals more right now.

Yeah your right it was post urban but still the numbers of large creatures no longer there still scale up to many more smaller than bigger.

Your also right that some areas can have less diversity and still large populations. But the point of the project is to have as much diversity as possible. And within that diversity to have it more balanced to how ecosystems work on Earth with many smaller creatures and fewer larger ones.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2008, 11:38:45 PM by Hydromancerx » Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 23 queries.

Google visited last this page Today at 09:46:47 AM